Back to services overview

Zero Trust · Public and private-sector IT

We don't trust the perimeter. We re-verify every access.

We move internal network security off the perimeter and onto a Zero Trust model that continuously verifies users, devices and access context and minimises access between systems, so a breach is contained early before it spreads.

Maturity assessment

Our assessment tool, built on the CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model (ZTMM), evaluates 45 items across six pillars. Maturity is rated in four stages for each area.

  1. Traditional
  2. Developing
  3. Enhancing
  4. Optimal
Zero Trust technical capabilities

1Identity

  • IGA
  • MFA
  • RBAC
  • Secrets Management
  • Access Mgmt & Identity Federation
  • PAM
  • PBAC (Risk Engine)

2Device

  • Device Inventory
  • EDR
  • Device Sandboxing
  • Baseline Config & Patch
  • Device Encryption
  • Device Compliance
  • Device AuthN/AuthZ
  • Risk-score Based Compliance
  • MDM

3Application

  • API Security
  • Application Micro Segmentation
  • Vulnerability Mgmt
  • Patch & Config Mgmt
  • WAF
  • Service Mesh
  • Container Security
  • CSPM
  • CASB & On-prem security

4Network & Infrastructure

  • SD-WAN
  • NGFW
  • DDoS Protection
  • Forward Proxy
  • IDS/IPS
  • RBI
  • Network Segmentation
  • ZTNA
  • NAC

5Data

  • Data Discovery
  • DLP
  • Removable Media Encryption
  • IRM
  • Data Classification
  • Data Access Monitoring
  • Masking & Tokenization

6Telemetry & Analytics, Automation & Orchestration

  • SOAR
  • UEBA
  • SIEM
  • Threat Intelligence

Where a typical organisation stands today

Identity
No integrated identity and privilege management; separate authentication for the IDC and the cloud
Device
Device security posture is not reflected in access decisions; discovery and inventory of new assets are poorly automated
Application
Little continuous authorisation or re-verification after first sign-in; weak management of open-source vulnerabilities and licences
Network
Perimeter-centred security; firewall policy changes and verification are poorly automated
Data
A weak security classification scheme for sensitive information

How we approach the transition

Core premise

Establish centralised privilege management through IAM, SSO and PAM

In addition

Introduce and embed specialised solutions, such as Micro Segmentation, that segment systems, workloads and processes

Case analysis: a Korean financial institution

This case combined Micro Segmentation with an existing IAM, SSO and PAM-based centralised privilege management framework, extending user authentication and privilege control into control of the communication between live systems, workloads and processes.

  1. 01Visibility into internal traffic

    Agents on servers, cloud workloads and user devices collect the actual traffic flows and identify server-to-server connections, application- and process-level communication, and unregistered assets

    Considerations

    Put enough effort into traffic-flow analysis to reduce the risk of business disruption when blocking policies are first applied

  2. 02Business-based logical grouping

    Attributes such as department, business function, application, OS, server role and criticality are defined as labels, sorting a complex IP and network structure into logical groups that carry business meaning

    Considerations

    When attaching labels, cross-check them against business and asset-management records to confirm consistency

  3. 03Linking central privilege data to communication policy

    Existing user, login ID, role and privilege data are used to build ACLs of the URLs, IPs and target systems each user may reach, so central privilege management is reflected in Micro Segmentation policy in real time

    Considerations

    Keep the link managed so that joiners, movers, leavers and role changes reach IAM privileges and ACLs quickly

  4. 04Least-privilege control per workload and process

    Only the communication needed between servers, applications, workloads and processes is allowed; administrator access is narrowed to designated devices, access paths, target servers, ports and processes, blocking outside intruders, unauthorised internal access and lateral movement to adjacent systems

    Considerations

    Manage critical business and administrator access through controlled policies covering approval, exceptions and expiry dates

  5. 05Phased policy rollout and maturing operations

    Labels, policy templates and automatic policy recommendations ease operational complexity and lay the groundwork for AI-based policy management and automated detection and response later

    Considerations

    Collect policy-violation, lateral-movement and unauthorised-access events in the SIEM, and link repeat responses to SOAR playbooks

Outcomes

Success factors and implications

  1. 01Use and connect existing controls

    Success factor

    Existing IAM, SSO and PAM data served as the common policy basis and was extended to workload access control

    Implication

    When introducing Micro Segmentation, aim for a Zero Trust design: an integrated policy structure that shares existing Identity and Risk data

  2. 02Internal visibility first

    Success factor

    Actual traffic and application dependencies were mapped first, and simulation before enforcement confirmed business impact and exception traffic

    Implication

    Avoid a company-wide rollout in one go; define protected zones starting with the business functions a breach would hurt most, and expand in stages

  3. 03Policy managed around meaningful business context

    Success factor

    Static ACLs built on IPs and ports were shifted to ones built on business functions, applications, roles and processes

    Implication

    Business, security and infrastructure teams settle labelling and allowed-traffic policy together, and agree expiry and re-approval rules for exceptions

  4. 04Link policy decision to enforcement

    Success factor

    IAM and PAM decide who holds which privileges; the solution connects how far those privileges reach across workloads and processes

    Implication

    Connect communication-policy violations to detection and response (violation events consolidated in the SIEM; high-risk scenarios automatically isolated, blocked and investigated in SOAR)

  5. 05Make containing breach spread the first goal

    Success factor

    Rather than complete prevention, the focus was on controlling spread to adjacent systems after a breach, keeping critical-business protected zones intact even under threat

    Implication

    Measure the effect by risk reduction (e.g. the rate at which unnecessary communication paths are removed), not by the number of policies written

Target architecture: ZTNA access control

We move internal network security off the perimeter and onto a model that continuously verifies users, devices and access context and minimises access between systems.

End-Point

  • Users
  • Administrators
  • Devices

PDP Policy decision

  • Policy management and evaluation
  • Access-request policy analysis
  • User identity verification
  • Device identity verification
  • Audit and log management
  • Real-time monitoring

Identity-based risk assessment

PEP Policy enforcement

  • MFA
  • SSO
  • EDR
  • DB access control
  • Unified access control
  • Cloud access control
  • …

Resource

  • Production network
  • Development network
  • Cloud (AWS)

Operating premises

  • Trust no location or network; verify every access continuously
  • Even after access is granted, detect changes in risk and keep re-evaluating privileges

What each component does

1
End-Point
Identifies every access subject: users, administrators and devices
2
PDP
Decides whether to allow access based on the risk of the identity, device and access context
3
PEP
Grants access on the least privilege the policy decided
4
Resource
Protects critical resources such as the IDC server farm, development network and cloud network as one

Experience

The projects below were carried out by Gwangmyung Maritime members at their previous organisations. They are not engagements of Gwangmyung Maritime as a company; we list them to show the range of our members’ experience.

Moving your internal network security to Zero Trust?

We design it with you, from assessing where you stand today to the target architecture and a phased transition plan.